Case 1308598/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Morrison v Prima 7 Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308598/2022
- Decision date
- 11 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Morrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting as a Rule 21 judgment, recorded that the Respondent did not attend. It found that the Claimant’s complaint of direct disability discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was well-founded and succeeded.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant’s complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was well-founded and succeeded. No separate findings are set out in the extracted text beyond the liability conclusions, and no apportionment of the award is given between the two claims.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered payment of one month’s contractual notice pay of £1,646.80 net, unpaid wages for 1 June 2022 to 15 July 2022 of £2,660.21 net, lost earnings for 16 August 2022 to 4 September 2022 of £1,064.09 net, and injury to feelings of £9,900. The monetary losses identified in the judgment total £5,371.10 before injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,271
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,371
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.