Case 1308614/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Aston v Greetings House Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308614/2022
- Decision date
- 4 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt Representation
- Venue
- In person at Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Aston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 August 2023, Employment Judge Platt found that the Respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the Claimant’s wages and that Miss D Aston’s complaint of pregnancy discrimination under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 succeeded. The extracted judgment does not set out further factual findings or legal reasoning beyond the remedy figures.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £218.50 for unlawful deductions from wages. On the pregnancy discrimination claim, it awarded £2,087.15 for losses caused by discriminatory dismissal, £3,119.43 for loss of maternity pay, and £10,000 for injury to feelings. The total monetary award stated in the judgment is £15,425.08.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £219 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment awards £2,087.15 for losses caused by discriminatory dismissal, £3,119.43 for loss of maternity pay, and £10,000 for injury to feelings on the pregnancy discrimination complaint. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £15,207 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,425
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,207
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.