Case 1308657/2023 · Employment Tribunal
MR DARREN BRADFORD v People Solutions Resourcing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1308657/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdin Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR DARREN BRADFORD
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was recorded as a preliminary hearing heard in public via CVP at the Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 5 June 2025 before Employment Judge Murdin. The claimant, Mr Darren Bradford, did not attend. The respondent appeared by counsel, Mr Ahmed.
The judgment states that the claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend and failed to comply with the unless order of Employment Judge Kelly dated 6 January 2025. No substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim are recorded in the extracted text.
The tribunal also stated, pursuant to Rule 39(2) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claimant may apply in writing within 14 days of the date the judgment is sent to have it set aside if he can show that doing so would be in the interests of justice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the pleaded cause of action; it only records that the claim was dismissed after the claimant failed to attend and failed to comply with the unless order dated 6 January 2025. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 39(2) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- interests of justice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.