Case 1308667/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Hardy v Ark Insurance — 2024
- Case reference
- 1308667/2023
- Decision date
- 2 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Hardy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, by Employment Judge Childe, struck out Miss K Hardy's claim against Ark Insurance. The judgment records that by letter dated 18 April 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the bases that it had no reasonable prospect of success, that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 20 December 2023, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive cause of action; it only states that 'the claim' was struck out. The gov.uk listing describes the case as breach of contract, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.