Case 1308723/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Raymond Donohoe v Buymyprint Limited (in liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 1308723/2023
- Decision date
- 7 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Knowles Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham remotely via CVP
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Raymond Donohoe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant was an employee of the First Respondent (Buymyprint Limited) at the time it became insolvent, with 13 years' service and a week's pay of £542.31 for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The First Respondent did not attend; the Second Respondent (the Secretary of State for Business & Trade) was represented. The Tribunal declared that the Claimant's claim for payments from the Second Respondent under section 182 ERA 1996 was well founded.
The Tribunal declared that the First Respondent was liable to make an employer's payment within the meaning of section 166(2)(a) ERA 1996, namely a redundancy payment of £10,575.05, payable by the Second Respondent. On complaints under section 188 ERA for payments under section 182, the Tribunal further declared that the Second Respondent ought to pay arrears of pay of £1,410.00 (s.184(a)), notice pay of £6,507.72 (s.184(b)) and holiday pay of £2,104.12 (s.184(c)).
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested. The judgment does not address any aggregate total award figure, nor does it itemise a basic or compensatory award structure beyond the statutory categories above.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Employer's payment under s.166(2)(a) ERA 1996, payable by the Second Respondent (SOS) under s.182 ERA 1996 following the First Respondent's insolvency. Based on a week's pay of £542.31 and 13 years' service. | Upheld | — | £10,575 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay declared payable by the Second Respondent under s.182 and s.184(a) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,410 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay declared payable by the Second Respondent under s.182 and s.184(b) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £6,508 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay declared payable by the Second Respondent under s.182 and s.184(c) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £2,104 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,597
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.182 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.184 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.166(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.170(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.188 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.