Mr AP Williams v Phosters (FM) Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 1308736/2019
Decision date: 8 April 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hughes

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr AP Williams

Respondent

Phosters (FM) Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr AP Williams. It does not set out any findings on liability, any factual background, or any reasoning on the merits of the case.

No remedy or monetary award is recorded, and the judgment contains no further particulars beyond the Rule 52 dismissal on withdrawal.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The short judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out the individual claims.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The short judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out the individual claims.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.