Case 1308771/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Battista v Colebridge Trust Limited & Others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1308771/2019
- Decision date
- 13 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Battista
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hughes struck out Miss J Battista's claim against Colebridge Trust Limited & Others under rule 37. The judgment records that, by letter dated 18/12/2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 21/07/2020 and for not being actively pursued. The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim types.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim and recorded that the hearing listed for 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13 July 2021 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 21/07/2020 and because it had not been actively pursued. The extracted text does not specify the underlying causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.