Case 1308796/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Samuels v Uzin UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1308796/2019
- Decision date
- 28 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Samuels
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Samuels brought claims against Uzin UK Ltd. At a hearing in Birmingham on 28 September 2020 before Employment Judge Hindmarch, with the claimant appearing in person and assisted by his friend Mr Skinner and the respondent represented by Mr Jagpal, the tribunal dealt with the question of time limits.
The tribunal held that the claims were presented out of time. It further found that Mr Samuels had not satisfied it that it was not reasonably practicable for him to present the claims in time. On that basis, the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claims.
The listed breach of contract, unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages and working time claims were therefore not determined on their merits, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Tribunal held the claim was presented out of time and that it was not satisfied it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal held the claim was presented out of time and that it was not satisfied it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal held the claim was presented out of time and that it was not satisfied it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Tribunal held the claim was presented out of time and that it was not satisfied it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- not reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.