Case 1308797/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Saw v Walsall College — 2026
- Case reference
- 1308797/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Saw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a rule 52 withdrawal judgment dated 3 July 2020. Employment Judge Miller recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Ms D Saw, against Walsall College.
The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the claims. It does not set out factual findings, legal analysis, or any award. The record therefore shows disposal by withdrawal rather than a substantive determination.
On the face of the case listing provided with the judgment, the matter included disability discrimination and unfair dismissal. The judgment itself does not distinguish between those heads of claim when recording the withdrawal or dismissal of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not separately analyse this head of claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not separately analyse this head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.