Case 1308814/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Not present or represented For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1308814/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Not present or represented For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter came before Employment Judge Dimbylow at an open preliminary hearing held remotely by CVP on 11 November 2020. The claimant was not present or represented; the respondent was represented by Mr J Wallace, Counsel. The hearing took place during the coronavirus pandemic and was conducted remotely in accordance with safe practice and guidelines.
The claimant applied for an adjournment, but that application was refused and dismissed. The tribunal then recorded that, because the claimant failed to attend the hearing, the claim was dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. No merits findings were made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text does not specify the substantive claim type. The tribunal refused the claimant's adjournment application and dismissed the claim because the claimant failed to attend the hearing, pursuant to Rule 47. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.