Case 1308860/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Richard Ennis, solicitor For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1308860/2019
- Decision date
- 27 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Appearance
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Richard Ennis, solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Birmingham by CVP on 24 to 27 May 2020 before Employment Judge Dean, found that Mr M Jordan was summarily dismissed because of gross misconduct. It concluded that the dismissal was fair, so his unfair dismissal complaint did not succeed.
The tribunal also rejected the claimant's wrongful dismissal complaint. The judgment records that all of the claimant's complaints were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was summarily dismissed because of gross misconduct and that the dismissal was fair. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.