Case 1308866/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Greenhough v Optimum Experience Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1308866/2023
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Greenhough
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing on 4 April 2025 before Employment Judge Faulkner sitting alone, the tribunal considered the respondent's application to amend its response. That application was refused. The hearing was remote by video and the parties did not object to that format.
The tribunal then struck out the response on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record does not set out the oral reasons given at the hearing, and it states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The judgment records that case management orders for the future conduct of the claim were made separately. No substantive liability issue or remedy was determined in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This public preliminary hearing did not determine any substantive claim. It refused the respondent's application to amend its response and struck out the response as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.