Case 1308876/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Ms. D. Hemming, Lay Representative — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308876/2022
- Decision date
- 25 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded. It also found that, had the respondent adopted a different procedure, the claimant's employment would have terminated in any event on 13 September 2022. The written extract does not set out any separate monetary award for unfair dismissal.
The redundancy payment claim succeeded, and the tribunal awarded £13,167.60. The holiday pay claim also succeeded, with an award of £877.84 gross. The notice pay claim succeeded as well, and the tribunal awarded £5,267.04 gross.
The tribunal recorded a total award of £19,312.48. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard note.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim succeeded. The tribunal found that if the respondent had adopted a different procedure, the claimant's employment would have terminated in any event on 13 September 2022. No separate monetary figure was set out for this claim in the written extract. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded a redundancy payment of £13,167.60. | Upheld | — | £13,168 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded holiday pay of £877.84 gross. | Upheld | — | £878 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded notice pay of £5,267.04 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,267 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,312
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.