Case 1308881/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H kerr v Anoop Deol — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308881/2022
- Decision date
- 22 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H kerr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal listed the claim as brought by Mrs H Kerr against Anoop Deol and then decided the matter on case management grounds rather than on the merits. By a letter dated 13 June 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The hearing fixed for 23 June 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not make sufficient representations in response to the letter dated 13 June 2023 and did not request a hearing on whether the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.