Case 1308965/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Davies v Lee Davies and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308965/2022
- Decision date
- 8 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss S Davies
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Smith sat alone in Birmingham by CVP on 8 November 2023 and made a Rule 21 judgment. The claimant appeared in person and neither respondent attended. The tribunal dismissed the claims against Lee Davies.
The tribunal declared that LD Brown Sugar Limited had made an unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to work carried out by the claimant in the week commencing 13 June 2022 and ordered it to pay £537.01 gross. It also upheld the claimant’s claim for a compensation payment for accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment and ordered LD Brown Sugar Limited to pay £588 gross. The total gross award was £1,125.01.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim dismissed as against the First Respondent, Lee Davies; unauthorised deduction of wages declared against the Second Respondent for work carried out in the week commencing 13 June 2022. | Upheld | — | £537 |
| Holiday pay | Claim dismissed as against the First Respondent, Lee Davies; compensation payment for accrued but untaken annual leave on termination ordered against the Second Respondent. | Upheld | — | £588 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,125
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.