Case 1308966/2019 · Employment Tribunal
(in person) Interpreter: Henryk Gumowski (Polish speaking) For the v Ms N Atwal (solicitor) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1308966/2019
- Decision date
- 4 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(in person) Interpreter: Henryk Gumowski (Polish speaking) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Birmingham on 4 June 2020 before Employment Judge Johnson, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's complaint of discrimination on grounds of gender reassignment. The judgment records that this complaint was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining complaint of discrimination on grounds of race was unaffected by this decision and remained in issue. No substantive determination is recorded in this judgment on that race discrimination complaint.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender reassignment discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint of discrimination on grounds of gender reassignment was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The claimant's remaining complaint of race discrimination was unaffected by this judgment and remained in issue. | Withdrawn | Gender reassignment | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.