Case 1308991/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Luke Rowlands v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1308991/2022
- Decision date
- 29 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy KC
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Luke Rowlands
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the respondent had paid the claimant his outstanding notice pay. No monetary amount for that payment is stated in the judgment.
The Tribunal then held that the remaining claims before it were not well founded and dismissed them. Oral reasons were given, and the judgment notes that written reasons would not be produced unless requested under Rule 62(3).
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the respondent had paid the claimant his outstanding notice pay before stating that the remaining claims were dismissed. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the remaining claims before the Tribunal were not well founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the remaining claims before the Tribunal were not well founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.