Case 1309012/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Andrews v Mr Rick Bloomer Manager — 2022
- Case reference
- 1309012/2019
- Decision date
- 20 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Andrews
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the claim by Mr M Andrews against Mr Rick Bloomer Manager was struck out. The reasons given were procedural: by a letter dated 31 August 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal’s orders dated 9 August 2022 and 17 August 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Gaskell ordered that the claim be struck out on 20 September 2022. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim and does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action; it only records that the claim was struck out. The gov.uk listing categorises the case as religion or belief discrimination, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.