Case 1309048/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Wood v A S Taverns Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309048/2019
- Decision date
- 19 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss L Wood started work for A S Taverns Limited on 15 February 2019 and remained employed by it until 9 October 2019. The respondent's account that her employment ended on 23 March 2019 and resumed in late June 2019 was rejected. The tribunal preferred the claimant's evidence, accepted that no P45 had been given to her, and found that she continued to work at The Old Greyhound throughout the period in issue. It also accepted her evidence that she took no holiday during employment, apart from one day off sick.
Applying regulations 13, 13A, 13(9) and 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal held that the claimant had accrued 18 days, or 3.6 weeks, of annual leave by the date her employment ended. On a weekly wage of £350, which the tribunal treated as £70 per day, it awarded £1,260 gross for accrued but untaken holiday. The amended judgment also recorded an unauthorised deduction from wages in the gross sum of £464, and stated that both sums were payable gross, with the claimant responsible for income tax and National Insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £464 |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,724
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulations 13, 13A, 13(9) and 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.