Case 1309076/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Enayot Choudhury v Modis International Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309076/2020
- Decision date
- 16 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Enayot Choudhury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands (West) Employment Tribunals on 16 September 2020. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment records that the respondent must pay the claimant £318.62 gross.
No separate findings, split remedies, or additional claims are set out in the judgment text provided. The decision is a short rule 21 judgment and records only the wages deduction finding and the gross amount payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £319 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £319
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.