Case 1309091/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wedge v CT Interiors Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309091/2019
- Decision date
- 2 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Wedge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 June 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr A Wedge an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his claim should not be struck out. The reason identified was that he appeared to lack the qualifying service required to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
Mr Wedge did not make any representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 1 and 2 July 2020 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal indicated the claimant appeared to lack the qualifying service needed to bring an unfair dismissal claim, and the claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.