Case 1309119/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v 24.7 Recruitment Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309119/2020
- Decision date
- 19 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe parties agreed liability and remedy, and the tribunal entered a judgment by consent. The tribunal declared that Ms A. Pavulane was unfairly dismissed by 24.7 Recruitment Services Ltd. No other substantive claims are identified in the extracted judgment text.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the agreed sum of £6,881.87. The judgment records that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied. It states that the total monetary award was £6,881.87, the prescribed element was £4,481.51, the relevant period for that element was 6 July 2020 to 1 October 2020, and the balance above the prescribed element was £2,400.36.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment by consent. The tribunal declared that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and recorded an agreed sum of £6,881.87 in respect of her claims, subject to recoupment provisions. The judgment does not split the award between heads of loss. | Upheld | — | £6,882 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,882
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.