Case 1309127/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309127/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr P Deneen, Mr N Forward
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Mr S Singhateh's claim of race discrimination against NIC Services Group Limited. The written record states only the outcome of that claim and does not include written reasons, because reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would only be provided if requested.
The tribunal upheld the claims of unfair dismissal and unpaid holiday. For unpaid holiday, it awarded two weeks' pay at £360 per week, making £720 gross.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,620, calculated as 4 x 1.5 x £360, reduced by 25% for contribution. It also awarded compensatory sums of £720 for two weeks' pay and £6,139 for one year's loss after a 50% Polkey reduction and a 25% contribution reduction.
The total award recorded was £9,199. The recoupment information recorded the prescribed element as £6,859 for the period 25 May 2020 to 8 June 2021, with a balance of £2,340.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of race discrimination fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal succeeded. The award comprised a basic award of £1,620 and compensatory award elements of £720 and £6,139. | Upheld | — | £8,479 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as unpaid holiday, awarded as 2 weeks at £360 per week, £720 gross. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,199
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,620
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,859
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey reduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.