Case 1309131/2019 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs I Kowalik (2) Mr M Glowacki v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309131/2019
- Decision date
- 24 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reindorf
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs I Kowalik (2) Mr M Glowacki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Mrs Kowalik's claim that there were unauthorised deductions from her wages was not well-founded. The claim failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the stated time limit.
Mr Glowacki did not appear at the hearing. The Tribunal recorded that the respondent had received no correspondence from him or on his behalf since the withdrawal of his solicitors, and that Mrs Kowalik thought he had withdrawn his claim. His claim was adjourned and made subject to an Unless Order requiring him to confirm by 4pm on 12 April 2021 whether he intended to pursue it, failing which it would be struck out without further order.
The hearing was held remotely by CVP. The judgment records that this was not objected to and that a face-to-face hearing was not held because no one requested it and all issues could be determined remotely.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs Kowalik's claim was described as a claim that there were unauthorised deductions from her wages; it was found not well-founded and dismissed. Mr Glowacki's claim was adjourned and not adjudicated in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.