Case 1309183/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S O'Sullivan v Better Pathways Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309183/2019
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S O'Sullivan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal’s judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability, facts in dispute, or remedy are recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment is dated 8 June 2020 and is headed as a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. It identifies the claimant as Miss S O'Sullivan and the respondent as Better Pathways Limited. The extracted text does not set out any decided issues beyond the fact of withdrawal and dismissal of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.