Case 1309199/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Timmins v Direct Engineering Wolverhampton Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309199/2019
- Decision date
- 7 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Timmins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Findlay signed judgment on 7 May 2020. The tribunal found that Direct Engineering Wolverhampton Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr M Timmins' wages and ordered the respondent to pay him the net sum of £646.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £323. The hearing listed for 27 May 2020 was cancelled. No other findings, legal tests, or remedy components were recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the net sum of £646. | Upheld | — | £646 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £323. | Upheld | — | £323 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £969
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.