Case 1309203/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309203/2019
- Decision date
- 2 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr R Virdee, Mr B Allen
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final merits hearing in Birmingham on 28 June to 2 July 2021, before Employment Judge Perry with Mr R Virdee and Mr B Allen, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of direct discrimination. The judgment states that she was not discriminated against contrary to part 5 of the Equality Act 2010. The extracted text does not set out written reasons because reasons were given orally and no written reasons were to be provided unless requested.
The tribunal also dismissed the constructive unfair dismissal complaint, finding that the claimant was not entitled to treat herself as dismissed and that the claim was not well founded. The wages and holiday pay complaints had been withdrawn at the case management hearing on 12 June 2020 and were therefore dismissed on withdrawal. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment refers to a complaint under part 5 of the Equality Act 2010 and says the direct discrimination complaint was dismissed. The public case listing identified the matter as race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not entitled to treat herself as dismissed and held that the constructive unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The wages complaint was withdrawn at the case management hearing on 12 June 2020 and was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint was withdrawn at the case management hearing on 12 June 2020 and was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.