Case 1309206/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Horton v Rebecca Taylor — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309206/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Horton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Hughes dated 2 March 2020. The claimant, Mr M Horton, brought claims against Rebecca Taylor arising out of the termination of employment and unpaid holiday entitlement.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £340.00 for that breach. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £294.00.
The judgment does not record any additional findings, liability issues, or separate heads of remedy beyond those two awards. The total sum payable on the face of the judgment is £634.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £340.00. | Upheld | — | £340 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £294.00. | Upheld | — | £294 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £634
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.