Case 1309207/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Buthusaim v Majesticare Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1309207/2020
- Decision date
- 20 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Members
- Panel members
- Mrs I Fox, Mr N Howard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Buthusaim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Birmingham by hybrid hearing from 15 to 17 February 2023 before Employment Judge Hindmarch, with lay members Mrs I Fox and Mr N Howard. Miss Buthusaim appeared in person and Majesticare Limited was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's direct race discrimination claims were not well founded. Those claims were dismissed. The decision does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claims of direct race discrimination were not well founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.