Case 1309217/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Storer v Crowd Property Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309217/2020
- Decision date
- 27 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Storer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing in Birmingham on 23 July 2021, Employment Judge Hindmarch dealt with two claims brought by Miss T Storer against Crowd Property Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not record any monetary award in relation to that claim.
The tribunal also determined the disability discrimination claim. It found that the claimant was not, at the material time, a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010. On that basis, the disability discrimination claim failed. The judgment records no further liability findings or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant was not, at the material time, a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010, so the disability discrimination claim failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.