Case 1309226/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T O’Halloran, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309226/2019
- Decision date
- 15 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
- Panel members
- Mr R Virdee, Mr MZ Khan
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss T O’Halloran, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. Those terms were to be finalised via ACAS and implemented within 28 days, unless either party made a further application by 26 March 2021.
On that basis, the tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the case. The effect of the judgment was that the proceedings would be dismissed without further judgment or order if no further application was made by the stated date.
The case was heard before Employment Judge Hughes sitting with members Mr R Virdee and Mr MZ Khan. The judgment was signed on 15 February 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties, to be finalised via ACAS and implemented within 28 days, unless either party made a further application by 26 March 2021. | Settled | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties, to be finalised via ACAS and implemented within 28 days, unless either party made a further application by 26 March 2021. | Settled | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.