Case 1309281/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Dyche First v A.S.P.E.C.T.S (Staffs) CIC Second Respondent: A.S.P.E.C.T.S (Staffordshire) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309281/2019
- Decision date
- 14 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Dyche First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the rule 21 hearing before Employment Judge Kelly on 14 April 2021, held by CVP, the claimant appeared in person and there was no attendance for the respondents. The tribunal recorded the claimant’s sex discrimination claim as dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £512.24 and ordered the respondents to pay that sum. It also found a breach of contract in respect of failure to pay notice pay of £1,024.50 and failure to pay expenses due of £381.30, and ordered payment of £1,405.80 for that claim.
The tribunal further found the claimant entitled to holiday pay of £306.00. On the figures stated in the judgment, the total monetary award was £2,224.04.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal recorded the sex discrimination claim as dismissed on withdrawal under rule 21. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £512 |
| Breach of contract | Award covered unpaid notice pay of £1,024.50 and expenses due of £381.30. | Upheld | — | £1,406 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay awarded in the sum stated by the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £306 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,224
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.