Case 1309309/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Hibbard v Mr Ashley White — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309309/2019
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Hibbard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Birmingham by Skype on 8 June 2020 before Employment Judge Flood sitting alone. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal recorded oral reasons at the hearing and issued a short written record of its decision.
The claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages succeeded in relation to the 5 days he worked between 16 and 20 September 2019. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £630 for that claim.
The claimant's complaint of accrued holiday pay also succeeded. The tribunal found that 23.5 days of holiday had accrued but remained untaken or unpaid, and ordered payment of £2,961.
The tribunal further awarded 4 weeks' pay because the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions in breach of section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The award was calculated by reference to average weekly pay of £630, capped at the statutory maximum weekly pay of £525 under section 227 ERA and section 38(6)(b) of the Employment Act 2002, producing an award of £2,100. The sums were ordered to be paid gross, with the claimant responsible for income tax and National Insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded for the 5 days worked between 16 and 20 September 2019. | Upheld | — | £630 |
| Holiday pay | Claim succeeded for 23.5 days accrued but untaken or unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,961 |
| Other | Award for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions in breach of section 1 ERA 1996, under section 38(6)(b) Employment Act 2002; the award was 4 weeks' pay, using average weekly pay of £630 capped at £525 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,691
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 1 ERA 1996
- section 227 ERA 1996
- section 38(6)(b) Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.