Case 1309318/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Paine v Landau Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309318/2020
- Decision date
- 8 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Paine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing on 1 December 2021 before Employment Judge Edmonds, the tribunal decided a preliminary disability issue. It found that Mrs Paine was not disabled at the relevant time, and the disability discrimination claim insofar as it was based on her own disability was dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's son was disabled at the relevant time. On that basis, the claim insofar as it related to her son's disability was allowed to proceed. The judgment did not determine the merits of that part of the case.
The remainder of the claimant's claims were left unaffected, and the matter was listed for final hearing from 19 September 2022 to 27 September 2022 inclusive.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant was not disabled at the relevant time and dismissed the disability discrimination claim insofar as it related to her own disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant's son was disabled at the relevant time and said the claim insofar as it related to his disability could proceed to final hearing. This was not a final merits outcome. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.