Case 1309330/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Beasley v Secretary of State for Education — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309330/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Beasley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Birmingham Employment Tribunal by CVP on 29 and 30 April 2021 before Employment Judge Cookson. Mr M Beasley appeared in person and the Secretary of State for Education was represented by Mr Line, counsel.
The judgment states that the claimant was not dismissed in accordance with s95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal did not succeed and was dismissed.
No discrimination claim, protected characteristic finding, or remedy award is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant was not dismissed in accordance with s95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the unfair dismissal claim did not succeed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.