Case 1309333/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E. Gibbs v TMT First Limited i — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309333/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy QC
- Venue
- By telephone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E. Gibbs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case by telephone on 6 April 2021 before Employment Judge Algazy QC. Mrs E. Gibbs appeared in person and TMT First Limited was represented by Ms T Hand.
The only claim recorded in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal dismissed that claim because the claimant did not have the requisite qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal claim under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No substantive dismissal issue was determined beyond that jurisdictional point, and the judgment records no award of compensation or other remedy.
The judgment is brief and does not identify any additional claims, findings on liability, or remedy calculations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the requisite qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal claim under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.