Case 1309367/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Miss Z Hussein (Solicitor) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309367/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing at Birmingham on 1 October 2021 before Employment Judge Gaskell. The record is a short disposal judgment and does not contain substantive findings on the merits of the allegations.
The tribunal dismissed all claims against the 1st respondent for want of jurisdiction, and all claims against the 2nd respondent after they were withdrawn by the claimant. It also granted the 3rd respondent an extension of time to file a response until 17 August 2021, as recorded in the order.
As to the 3rd respondent, the claim for unlawful age discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal. The race discrimination and victimisation claims against the 3rd respondent were dismissed for want of jurisdiction. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Blanket dismissal of all claims against the 1st respondent for want of jurisdiction; the extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim type in this order. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Blanket dismissal of all claims against the 2nd respondent after withdrawal by the claimant; the extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim type in this order. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The claim against the 3rd respondent for unlawful age discrimination was dismissed upon being withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination claim against the 3rd respondent was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim against the 3rd respondent was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.