Case 1309398/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms J Walker (Solicitor) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309398/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Gaskell in Birmingham on 1 February 2021. The claimant was represented in person and the respondent by Ms J Walker, solicitor. The tribunal dealt only with jurisdictional time-limit issues.
The judgment states that the claimant’s claims for unpaid wages, unpaid notice pay, unfair dismissal, and disability discrimination were presented out of time. On that basis, each claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the underlying complaints.
No remedy was awarded, and the decision records that reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record notes that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of sending the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages was presented out of time and dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for unpaid notice pay was presented out of time and dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim was presented out of time and dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Disability discrimination claim was presented out of time and dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.23(2) ERA 1996
- s.23(4) ERA 1996
- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.