Case 1309402/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Breen v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1309402/2022
- Decision date
- 13 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Breen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by Royal Mail Group Limited as a driver and was a CWU member and branch vice chairman. He was summarily dismissed on 23 November 2022 and applied for interim relief, asserting that the reason for dismissal was his CWU membership or participation in trade union activities, including acting as a picket supervisor. The respondent said the dismissal related to conduct, including alleged aggressive and intimidating behaviour towards two colleagues and a security guard.
The tribunal treated the application as requiring a summary predictive assessment of whether it was likely that, at the final hearing, the tribunal would find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was trade union membership or trade union activities at an appropriate time. The claimant relied on alleged unfairness in the disciplinary process, the industrial dispute, and CWU material alleging a wider policy of suspending or dismissing members and representatives.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant had not discharged the burden required for interim relief. It found that, on the material before it, it could not say it was likely that the final tribunal would resolve the factual dispute about trade union activities in the claimant's favour, or that it would find the reason or principal reason for dismissal was trade union membership or participation in trade union activities. The application for interim relief was refused.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal refused the claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996. The substantive complaint of automatically unfair dismissal for trade union membership and/or activities was not finally determined in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 129 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 152 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 95 Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Taplin v C. Shippam Limited
- Ministry of Justice v Sarfraz
- London City Airport Limited v Chacko
- pretty good chance of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.