Case 1309418/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1309418/2022
- Decision date
- 13 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Kenward sitting alone in Birmingham on 12 and 13 April 2023. The claimant, Mr M Kerr, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, recording that it was not well-founded.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the gross sum of £305.78. The judgment states that the claimant was entitled to a declaration to that effect. No separate remedy breakdown is provided for the dismissal claim, and the written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records an unauthorised deduction from wages of £305.78 gross. | Upheld | — | £306 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £306
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.