Case 1309441/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For v Mrs S Lovatt (Director) Interpreter: Ms C Hart (Romanian) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309441/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case on 25 February 2021 before Employment Judge Gaskell, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mrs S Lovatt. The judgment records that the claimant's disability discrimination, race discrimination, and unpaid wages claims were dismissed upon being withdrawn by the claimant.
By consent of the parties, the claimant's unpaid holiday pay claim was found well-founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,322.50 gross.
The judgment notes that the holiday pay sum was calculated gross, and that on payment the respondent must make appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance contributions and account for them to HMRC. The respondent was also ordered to provide written details of the deductions to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon being withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the race discrimination claim was dismissed upon being withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claim for unpaid wages was dismissed upon being withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | By consent of the parties, the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay was found well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,322.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,323 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,323
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.