Case 1309525/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Isip v AXA Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309525/2020
- Decision date
- 6 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Isip
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 January 2021 Employment Judge Mark Butler recorded that Miss A Isip's claims against AXA Services Limited were sex discrimination, unlawful deduction from wages, family leave dismissal pursuant to s.99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and disability discrimination. The judgment states that those claims were withdrawn by email dated 30 December 2020.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the listed claims on withdrawal. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were recorded in the judgment, and the written record notes only that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Withdrawn by email dated 30 December 2020; the tribunal recorded the claim as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Withdrawn by email dated 30 December 2020; the tribunal recorded the claim as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Family leave dismissal claim pursuant to s.99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Withdrawn by email dated 30 December 2020 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Withdrawn by email dated 30 December 2020; the tribunal recorded the claim as dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.