Case 1309541/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Brooker v Gist Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309541/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wilkinson Representation
- Venue
- The Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Brooker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel at a remote hearing before Employment Judge Wilkinson on 26 April 2021.
The tribunal dismissed the claim, stating that it was without merit. No detailed reasons or separate findings on the pleaded complaints are set out in the extracted judgment.
The claimant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs, summarily assessed at £3,070.10 plus VAT at 20%, giving a total of £3,684.12 payable within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that 'the claim' is without merit and dismissed, without separately analysing or listing individual complaints. The gov.uk listing categories identify unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that 'the claim' is without merit and dismissed, without separately analysing or listing individual complaints. The gov.uk listing categories identify breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,684
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.