Case 1309544/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ewelina Dorosz v Poppys Entertainment Ltd and Scotts Restaurant — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309544/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Steward Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ewelina Dorosz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to RHD Midland Ltd under the principles in Selkent Bus Company Limited v Moore. It accepted the claimant's evidence, where it conflicted with the respondent's, and found that she worked as a restaurant manager at Scotts Restaurant from 4 March 2020 to 1 August 2020, was paid £479 per week gross, worked to a rota with specified hours, and was an employee of RHD Midland Ltd.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the claimant had worked 21 weeks, had taken 5 days' holiday when she went to Poland, and had accrued 1.76 weeks' leave. It held that on termination she was entitled to payment in lieu of accrued but untaken leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998, and that the respondent's failure to pay that sum was an unauthorised deduction from wages. The award on that claim was £843.04 gross.
On notice, the tribunal rejected the respondent's assertion of gross misconduct and found that the claimant had been dismissed on 1 August 2020 without notice. It held that no contractual notice period had been agreed and that one week's notice was due under the statutory minimum notice provisions in section 86 ERA 1996, so damages of £479 gross were awarded for breach of contract. The tribunal also considered an issue under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 but made no additional award because it found that the claimant had been given a written statement of employment particulars.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Failure to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination; the tribunal calculated 1.76 weeks' leave at £479 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £843 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal without notice; the tribunal found the claimant was entitled to one week's notice and awarded one week's gross pay. | Upheld | — | £479 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,322
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Selkent Bus Company Limited v Moore [1996] ICR 836
- section 230(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.