Case 1309592/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Leaps Playcentre Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309592/2020
- Decision date
- 5 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay unpaid wages of £662.12 gross, as set out in the attached annex.
The claimant’s breach of contract claim succeeded in relation to unpaid notice pay. The tribunal awarded damages of £105.60, described in the judgment as one week’s pay.
The claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay on termination of employment also succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £426.18, again by reference to the attached annex. The total sum awarded across the three claims was £1,193.90.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of unpaid wages in the gross sum of £662.12, referring to the attached annex. | Upheld | — | £662 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the claim for breach of contract in respect of unpaid notice pay and ordered damages of £105.60, described as one week’s pay. | Upheld | — | £106 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid holiday pay on termination of employment and ordered payment of £426.18, referring to the attached annex. | Upheld | — | £426 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,194
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.