Case 1309715/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Tammy Morris v Simply Acts Functioning Limited, trading as Ivy Leaf Sports and Social Club — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309715/2020
- Decision date
- 8 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coghlin QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Tammy Morris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Tammy Morris brought a claim against Simply Acts Functioning Limited, trading as Ivy Leaf Sports and Social Club, for failure to pay accrued untaken holiday. The hearing was held remotely in Birmingham on 8 September 2021 before Employment Judge Coghlin QC. The respondent did not appear or have representation.
The tribunal upheld the holiday pay claim brought under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulations 14, 16 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £595.66.
The judgment records that the award was a gross sum, subject to any deductions required by law for tax and national insurance. The figure was calculated by reference to 4.14 weeks' accrued but untaken holiday as at 26 September 2020, multiplied by 16.5 hours per week at the applicable national minimum wage rate of £8.72.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unpaid accrued but untaken holiday succeeded under sections 13 and 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulations 14, 16 and 30 Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £596 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £596
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.