Case 1309749/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Badham v Jaguar Land Rover Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1309749/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden Members
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Mr P Kennedy, Mr R White
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Badham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claim. The written judgment states that the claim form ought to have been rejected under Rule 12(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It does not set out findings on the merits of any underlying complaints, nor does it identify any remedy awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the pleaded claim types in the operative text; it states only that the claim is dismissed because the claim form ought to have been rejected under Rule 12(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 12(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.