Case 1310149/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Koser (Solicitor) For the v Ms K Ayre (Solicitor) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1310149/2020
- Decision date
- 4 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Koser (Solicitor) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 4 June 2021, Employment Judge Gaskell dealt with the claimant's application to amend the claim following earlier case management directions from Employment Judge Meichen. The case had already been case managed on 21 February 2021, and the claimant had been ordered to provide further particulars.
The tribunal refused permission to amend to include allegation 2(b), but granted permission to amend to include allegation 2(t). The further particulars made clear that allegations 2(a), 2(b), 2(m) and 2(o) were pleaded as acts of racial harassment in the alternative to direct race discrimination, and the respondent did not object to those allegations proceeding on that basis.
In allowing the amendment for allegation 2(t), the tribunal recorded the claimant's account that he became aware of the relevant facts at the beginning of February 2021, in conversation with Mr Malcolm Clifford and Mr Alex Capok, and that the disclosure of confidential information said to amount to an act of direct race discrimination was by Mr Paul Godding. The tribunal expressly made no finding on whether it had jurisdiction to hear allegation 2(t), leaving timeliness or any extension of time to the final hearing panel. The parties were directed to file an updated agreed list of issues by 16 July 2021, and the case remained listed for final hearing in January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Procedural application to amend the claim to include allegation 2(b); permission refused under Rule 29. No merits finding was made. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Procedural application to amend the claim to include allegation 2(t); permission granted under Rule 29. The tribunal made no finding on jurisdiction or limitation, leaving that issue to the final hearing. | Upheld | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.