Case 1310272/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Breillat v Oxbridge Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1310272/2022
- Decision date
- 25 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Breillat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 25 May 2023 before Employment Judge Childe at West Midlands (Birmingham) by CVP, the claimant, Mr N Breillat, was represented in person and the respondent, Oxbridge Ltd, was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew all of his complaints in the proceedings.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the complaints of unauthorised deductions from pay under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996, breach of contract, unauthorised deductions and breach of contract in respect of holiday pay, holiday pay under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and unfair dismissal under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996, all under rule 52 following withdrawal.
The respondent's costs application was refused for the reasons given orally at the hearing. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 52 following the claimant's withdrawal of the complaint. The judgment also listed holiday-pay deductions within the same overall complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under rule 52 following the claimant's withdrawal of all complaints. The judgment included a separate breach of contract complaint and referred to breach of contract in respect of holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed under rule 52 following the claimant's withdrawal of the holiday pay complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under rule 52 following the claimant's withdrawal of the complaint under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under rule 52 following the claimant's withdrawal of the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 52
- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Part X Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.