Case 1310347/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For v Mr J Haimes (Director) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1310347/2020
- Decision date
- 19 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 19 February 2021, Employment Judge Gaskell found that the claimant’s claims for unpaid wages and unpaid notice pay were well-founded. The tribunal awarded £150 gross for unpaid wages and £375 gross for unpaid notice pay, making a total award of £525 gross against the respondent, The Garden Furniture Centre Limited.
The judgment records that the sums were calculated gross. It also states that, on payment, it is the claimant’s responsibility to account to HMRC for income tax and national insurance contributions. No further reasons were provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages was well-founded and awarded £150 gross. | Upheld | — | £150 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant’s claim for unpaid notice pay was well-founded and awarded £375 gross. | Upheld | — | £375 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £525
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.